The Democrats’ triumph -- and their test

Some notes on the midterms

Last night the authoritarian attempt of President Donald J. Trump was brutally slapped down, and a nation awash in a sense of abandonment once again rolled the dice. It was a stunning, historic victory for Democrats. It will also begin a formidable test. The emotion that swept them back to power is the one that once uplifted Trump: the sense that nothing one had tried was working, so try something else. The question facing Democrats is how to break out of the cycle of faith, disappointment, and revolt. How to end the abandonment instead of driving the abandoned to roll the dice again.

I’m still processing the historic “blunami,” as I’m sure you are. But I wanted to open my notebook and share some of the meaning I’m making and questions I’m asking: how the “orchestra principle” flourished here, how narrowly or broadly the mandate should be interpreted, the Zohran effect, why Trump was in a certain way a godsend, and the work of sowing the era beyond him.

The orchestra principle

Already this morning, the pundits are punditing. Did the results prove that moderates are preferred over socialists? Or the reverse? Which faction has the upper hand going into 2028? The inevitable pundit questions.

I think there’s a more interesting story to tell. Part of what I see in 2026 is Democrats maturing in their ability to hold difference. They hung together without having to be the same. On the ballot were full-blown leftists, democratic socialists, progressives, liberals, moderates, and other flavors besides. And while there were plenty of heated debates and no dearth of punches landed, there was an underlying story of integration at work that perhaps got less attention.

A so-called “moderate” like James Talarico, running for the U.S. Senate in Texas, ran on a fervent anti-billionaire agenda that would never have come to pass if Senator Bernie Sanders hadn’t run for president twice and built a lasting movement. A so-called progressive like Abdul El-Sayed, running for the Senate in Michigan, spoke of reclaiming patriotism and “America first from the left” in a way that blurred lines.

Yes, there was a great deal of enmity over Israel and Gaza. Here’s another way to look at it: Positions on that question that used to be heard only on the lips of activists on the fringes were heard more and more by the mainstream. The activists, in other words, did their job, which is to scream and scream until your ideas become common sense and everyone forgets to be grateful to you for saying it before it was easy to say. And the mainstream did their job, which is to respond to where people are.

There has long been talk of the need for a popular front against American fascism. This diverse Democratic Party looked a lot like one. And, to my eyes at least, people seemed less fearful of being associated with people with whom they don’t agree. El-Sayed movingly explained his differences with former President Barack Obama as the differences one might have with one’s father, as one tries to build on what he left you, feeling both the gratitude and the dissatisfaction.

What we witnessed is what I have called the “orchestra principle”: a political ethos in which one recognizes that one is supposed to play one’s instrument, and that others are not failing by playing other instruments. The orchestra needs prophets and it needs activists and it needs pragmatists who can win in strange places. This election, for all the noise and genuine conflict, showed the orchestra principle at work.

Stay focused — but on what?

There would seem to be a paradoxical strangeness to this mandate Democrats have won. It is, on one hand, utterly enormous. It is, on the other, philosophically narrow, overwhelmingly fueled by a rage at high prices and the difficulty of eking out a life.

If the past is a guide, there would seem to be two risks here. One is underdelivering, under-trying, failing to use every lever of power. People want help. They feel like the last time someone cared was in their grandparents’ day. They are protesting not one price tag or bill so much as the overall sense that merely to exist has become too hard.

But this surge of power, and all the different candidates and programs that won, will inevitably unleash a flood of big ideas of how this capital should be spent. Should everything be strictly about prices? Should time and energy be spent on the Epstein files? Should Trump be impeached? Should the relationship with Israel be reset? These are all worthy issues that were on the ballot and have fervor behind them. But Democrats will have to juggle the desire and what they surely see as the mandate to do big, sweeping things with the mood of an electorate that wants an easier life, now.

One place they might look is Zohran Mamdani, the mayor of New York, who arguably had a bigger role in this election than some would give a local official credit for. He has done many things in his short time in office, but one of them is to walk the line between sweeping progressive goals and an unwavering focus on basic quality of life, the immediately palpable, and actual governance. He has operated in a way that makes it hard to dismiss him as a mushy moderate, but also hard to dismiss him as an out-of-touch revolutionary focused on the distant future, not right now. I know firsthand that some moderate Democrats who would not be caught dead with Mamdani at a campaign event have privately reached out to try to understand his threading of this needle. There may be more of them hopping on flights to New York.

The challenge is to do big things without making people feel they are pie in the sky, or fruit-bearing only in a far-off time, or motivated by ideology more than urgent need.

We got lucky with Trump

Has this era made you feel especially lucky? It hasn’t made me feel especially lucky.

And yet. One of the things I take from these midterms is that, if we were going to have an authoritarian attempt, we lucked out in the person who gave it a shot.

Trump, as the public rightly sensed last night, turned out to be an authoritarian very untalented at the business of authoritarianism.

In the end, he was so focused on personal plunder and D.C. renovation that his authoritarian project got short shrift.

He was so out of touch (being in touch being the core competence of the demagogue) that, having tapped into a real hunger to stop dumb wars, he started a dumb war.

History is full of highly focused authoritarians. There are many operating around the world now. Trump turned out not to be one.

The implication, though, is: We may not be so lucky next time.

Now, win the peace

As Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed told me not long ago, the challenge is not only to win the war against Trump. It’s to win the peace. It’s to heal the conditions in the country that made a dice roll like Trump appealing.

So, as I suggested above, Democrats will have the challenge of staying focused on the bread and butter of making human survival feel like something not only oligarchs can afford. At the same time, they would be wise to think about how to usher in the next culture, the next era, beyond Trump and Trumpism. This is a gargantuan project.

What will define this new era? Will it be rooted, as Talarico said in his excellent victory speech yesterday, in a politics of love rather than hate? How does such a politics take root? How we move past the algorithmically encouraged enmities and suspicions and fears that have brought us to this dark place? In the face of AI everything, is it enough simply to push back against data centers and catastrophic risk, or is there a case to be made for a humanist renaissance, a re-weaving of our frayed relations, and what is the role of politics in bringing that into the world?

Donald Trump was always a mere symptom who craved the respect of being a disease. Last night, the symptom was loudly repudiated. We’re still living with the disease. It reveals itself in our collective isolation and fragmentation, our lack of good faith, the tenor of our disagreements, our celebration of extra-legal ways of getting the world we want. He was always just our shared darkness rendered as an operatic but small man.

The task now is to make America never again vulnerable to this kind of malicious, mendacious, idiotic attack. This was enough.

---

Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty