Good thing you were on that show A.G. b/c they needed your deeply insightful work & help. You DID answer the Q about why now-by going back over time and what was 'missed', ignored-nice props to the Julie K. Brown-yes, she does deserve a pulitzer. Stephen Fowler (name? the other person) was cautionary why? I didn't hear him speak about the victims whose information has been revealed by the DOJ and perpetrators who've been redacted in the files but he mentions one person who was in the file but unimportant-what was his point exactly? Finally, something I'm hearing a lot of, and it's not meaningless 'accountability'-e.g. there are times when 'accountability' is being used when we should be using the word PROSECUTE. Similar, but not the same and I think we need to be hearing PROSECUTE a lot more in ongoing discussions about this matter because in many cases this is what 'accountability should result in.
I love the outrage that Anand brought to this discussion. This is the biggest scandal in this century and talking about any of this as if it is just another day at work is why accountability has been elusive.
It is counterintuitive to think of Iran and then of Epstein, though, in strange ways, perhaps less so. Epstein needs to be the leading word in any conversation regarding Trump.
Are enough people ready to rise to the occasion to elect democratic representatives and a President who loves democracy and knows something about it?
Of course, his little dog Toto, who is not so little, would have to go too, and the other Christian Nationalists (sorry, I forgot to preface that with "white".
This needs repetition, not because it is a Big Lie, but because it is a phenomenally important truth — the connection between Epstein and Trump.
If not, it’s a blot on our country. Wealthy men who defiled scores of youn girls and no accountability.
Excellent discussion 🌹👍
Good thing you were on that show A.G. b/c they needed your deeply insightful work & help. You DID answer the Q about why now-by going back over time and what was 'missed', ignored-nice props to the Julie K. Brown-yes, she does deserve a pulitzer. Stephen Fowler (name? the other person) was cautionary why? I didn't hear him speak about the victims whose information has been revealed by the DOJ and perpetrators who've been redacted in the files but he mentions one person who was in the file but unimportant-what was his point exactly? Finally, something I'm hearing a lot of, and it's not meaningless 'accountability'-e.g. there are times when 'accountability' is being used when we should be using the word PROSECUTE. Similar, but not the same and I think we need to be hearing PROSECUTE a lot more in ongoing discussions about this matter because in many cases this is what 'accountability should result in.
I love the outrage that Anand brought to this discussion. This is the biggest scandal in this century and talking about any of this as if it is just another day at work is why accountability has been elusive.
It is counterintuitive to think of Iran and then of Epstein, though, in strange ways, perhaps less so. Epstein needs to be the leading word in any conversation regarding Trump.
Are enough people ready to rise to the occasion to elect democratic representatives and a President who loves democracy and knows something about it?
Of course, his little dog Toto, who is not so little, would have to go too, and the other Christian Nationalists (sorry, I forgot to preface that with "white".
This needs repetition, not because it is a Big Lie, but because it is a phenomenally important truth — the connection between Epstein and Trump.
Thanks for this.