I am sorry to learn that you've given Galloway a platform. Sure, he's a professor; of marketing. And that's what he's doing these days, marketing himself and his misogyny as if he has a degree in some social science. I find it quite disturbing that so many are so willing to legitimize him and his manosphere-friendly Bropinions dressed up as discourse.
Actually, I would have to respectfully disagree. While your opinion of Scott may be right or wrong, it is irrelevant here. The fact that he invited Anand on his show to discuss human connection and belonging and it's societal effects is something we should want the so called "manosphere" to engage in. More importantly, as a business guy, Stern School Prof and numbers geek, Anand sharing the "natural experiment" information of Fountain House was brilliant. That is something this guy will no doubt be fascinated by.
Thanks for your response, Jayne. I needed calling out; I commented before I saw the conversation and sometimes, I really should wait until I know what I’m talking about before I start typing. This conversation was quite interesting, and I’m glad I’ve ordered the book. I’ve seen firsthand what Anand described with Fountain House when I was working with a new model for geriatric mental health and support for caregivers within the medical community that ended because funding wasn’t continued despite some decreases in medical care utilization, and regardless of the improvement in many families’ ability to care effectively for their elders and for themselves. Collaboration and support were part of that program, too, helping caregivers feel less isolated and more engaged with others. The topic of social isolation and disconnection is such an important one, and while there are certainly many contributors to it, I see the “American Way” as supporting and promoting individualism and isolation from others as a great capitalistic tool: it keeps individuals insecure, anxious and compliant, thus we buy, we work to keep buying, we don’t see the value in contributing to – or relying on - our community, because we don’t really believe in community. Thus, I see it as a problem that will take many bright minds and lots of real effort to address with any efficacy. The problem I have is that I have seen Prof Galloway too many times reduce the solution to disconnectedness in men as a problem that women should be held responsible to fix because generally, women tend to be more community-oriented and better able to make social connections. And I find that to be either uninformed and based on the confidence of mediocre-White-man with an opinion and a platform, or cynical, opportunistic and misogynist. Either way, I’m not impressed. It concerns me to think that Galloway is shielding his misogynist, reductive and unsavory views of the connection/disconnection problem by participating in a dialogue with someone as thoughtful, nuanced and actually working to contribute in a positive way to the subject as Anand is.
TY. I hear you. Ironically, language can sometimes be a barrier to communication. I will give Galloway his point that there is a masculinity crisis of sorts right now mainly because the 2 areas that were used to define it (physical strength & breadwinner) are no longer needed in modern society. We would all be better served by expanding the definition of masculinity. Unfortunately those in power simply want to turn the clock back and cling to the past because they lack the imagination to see beyond it. Anand serves as a role model here and who better to do that with than Galloway. 😉
That is one excellent point! (I still wish Galloway would sit down and hold his opinions until he's actually learned about the subject, and let people who know and study the topic speak. Like Anand, which if you watch the video, Galloway did sort of have a bit of a sheepish look on his face while Anand was speaking, and I thought, while watching it, that maybe he realized that he was in over his head with Anand. Humility would be a good thing.)
Anand, As much as I enjoy your interviews, I have to say this one was masterful. What a great venue in which to share the "natural experiment" of Fountain House as well as the NY state constitutional right to shelter info. Loved it. Hope to see more on that when you discuss your book. TY.
Two of my favorite new media guys! I definitely want to see you engaged in other discussons, maybe starting with a continuation of this episode. There is still so much to say after Anand's last statements, but time constraints ended it too soon.
Galloway has been out of bounds in denying Israel’s genocide in Gaza - going against the United Nations and Israel’s own human rights organizations. It’s an unfortunate time to give him a platform.
There is another natural experiment that neither Anand or Scott will have heard about, which, by fostering generalized reciprocity, has led to profound changes in levels of empowerment and connection in communities across the country and around the world. It’s called Timebanking, was founded by civil rights lawyer and activist Edgar Cahn. His book, No More Throw-Away People argued that our profit-based understanding of the economy basically ignored the “core economy”‘of home, family, neighborhood and community. He developed a new currency, now broadly termed Timebanking, to build generalized reciprocity by which community members recognize, honor and reward the capacities, strengths and actions of their fellow community members that contribute to the wellbeing and strength of one another. Timebanking has five core principles, the first of which is that everyone has something to offer. As it happens Timebanking is thriving in New York City.
Edgar died in 2022. He was a visionary who found receptive audiences on the left and right. I encourage both Anand and Scott to learn more at TimeBanks.org
Yes yes yes thank you Scott for “The answer is each other”. How can it not begin there? Here at home in every encounter one moment at a time. To the root cause Anand has identified … yes! We have abandoned ourselves and consequently naturally abandon each other!💞 What if can build our heart-mind connection and retrieve that irrationally passionate care and love Scott speaks of … for ourselves? And so be able to overflow that naturally onto anyone we encounter? We can start here now! Just pause, take a deep breath, ask “what’s the kindest most compassionate thing I can do for myself right now?” and listen to your own answer. Then listen in the same way to whomever you encounter in the movement of every day life. 🌺
The far right is not a revolt against the system. It is the insurance policy the rich buy when democracy threatens their wealth. -Minority Report
I am sorry to learn that you've given Galloway a platform. Sure, he's a professor; of marketing. And that's what he's doing these days, marketing himself and his misogyny as if he has a degree in some social science. I find it quite disturbing that so many are so willing to legitimize him and his manosphere-friendly Bropinions dressed up as discourse.
And Galloway’s denial of Israel’s genocide in Gaza is out of bounds with every human rights organization on the planet.
Actually, I would have to respectfully disagree. While your opinion of Scott may be right or wrong, it is irrelevant here. The fact that he invited Anand on his show to discuss human connection and belonging and it's societal effects is something we should want the so called "manosphere" to engage in. More importantly, as a business guy, Stern School Prof and numbers geek, Anand sharing the "natural experiment" information of Fountain House was brilliant. That is something this guy will no doubt be fascinated by.
Thanks for your response, Jayne. I needed calling out; I commented before I saw the conversation and sometimes, I really should wait until I know what I’m talking about before I start typing. This conversation was quite interesting, and I’m glad I’ve ordered the book. I’ve seen firsthand what Anand described with Fountain House when I was working with a new model for geriatric mental health and support for caregivers within the medical community that ended because funding wasn’t continued despite some decreases in medical care utilization, and regardless of the improvement in many families’ ability to care effectively for their elders and for themselves. Collaboration and support were part of that program, too, helping caregivers feel less isolated and more engaged with others. The topic of social isolation and disconnection is such an important one, and while there are certainly many contributors to it, I see the “American Way” as supporting and promoting individualism and isolation from others as a great capitalistic tool: it keeps individuals insecure, anxious and compliant, thus we buy, we work to keep buying, we don’t see the value in contributing to – or relying on - our community, because we don’t really believe in community. Thus, I see it as a problem that will take many bright minds and lots of real effort to address with any efficacy. The problem I have is that I have seen Prof Galloway too many times reduce the solution to disconnectedness in men as a problem that women should be held responsible to fix because generally, women tend to be more community-oriented and better able to make social connections. And I find that to be either uninformed and based on the confidence of mediocre-White-man with an opinion and a platform, or cynical, opportunistic and misogynist. Either way, I’m not impressed. It concerns me to think that Galloway is shielding his misogynist, reductive and unsavory views of the connection/disconnection problem by participating in a dialogue with someone as thoughtful, nuanced and actually working to contribute in a positive way to the subject as Anand is.
TY. I hear you. Ironically, language can sometimes be a barrier to communication. I will give Galloway his point that there is a masculinity crisis of sorts right now mainly because the 2 areas that were used to define it (physical strength & breadwinner) are no longer needed in modern society. We would all be better served by expanding the definition of masculinity. Unfortunately those in power simply want to turn the clock back and cling to the past because they lack the imagination to see beyond it. Anand serves as a role model here and who better to do that with than Galloway. 😉
That is one excellent point! (I still wish Galloway would sit down and hold his opinions until he's actually learned about the subject, and let people who know and study the topic speak. Like Anand, which if you watch the video, Galloway did sort of have a bit of a sheepish look on his face while Anand was speaking, and I thought, while watching it, that maybe he realized that he was in over his head with Anand. Humility would be a good thing.)
Anand, As much as I enjoy your interviews, I have to say this one was masterful. What a great venue in which to share the "natural experiment" of Fountain House as well as the NY state constitutional right to shelter info. Loved it. Hope to see more on that when you discuss your book. TY.
Two of my favorite new media guys! I definitely want to see you engaged in other discussons, maybe starting with a continuation of this episode. There is still so much to say after Anand's last statements, but time constraints ended it too soon.
I felt exactly the same. I have sent a link to this episode to my Mayor as well as a local independent news source to give them some ideas.
Fascinating discussion. I can’t wait to read Anand’s new book. (Yes, I’ve preordered it)
Galloway has been out of bounds in denying Israel’s genocide in Gaza - going against the United Nations and Israel’s own human rights organizations. It’s an unfortunate time to give him a platform.
There is another natural experiment that neither Anand or Scott will have heard about, which, by fostering generalized reciprocity, has led to profound changes in levels of empowerment and connection in communities across the country and around the world. It’s called Timebanking, was founded by civil rights lawyer and activist Edgar Cahn. His book, No More Throw-Away People argued that our profit-based understanding of the economy basically ignored the “core economy”‘of home, family, neighborhood and community. He developed a new currency, now broadly termed Timebanking, to build generalized reciprocity by which community members recognize, honor and reward the capacities, strengths and actions of their fellow community members that contribute to the wellbeing and strength of one another. Timebanking has five core principles, the first of which is that everyone has something to offer. As it happens Timebanking is thriving in New York City.
Edgar died in 2022. He was a visionary who found receptive audiences on the left and right. I encourage both Anand and Scott to learn more at TimeBanks.org
Yes yes yes thank you Scott for “The answer is each other”. How can it not begin there? Here at home in every encounter one moment at a time. To the root cause Anand has identified … yes! We have abandoned ourselves and consequently naturally abandon each other!💞 What if can build our heart-mind connection and retrieve that irrationally passionate care and love Scott speaks of … for ourselves? And so be able to overflow that naturally onto anyone we encounter? We can start here now! Just pause, take a deep breath, ask “what’s the kindest most compassionate thing I can do for myself right now?” and listen to your own answer. Then listen in the same way to whomever you encounter in the movement of every day life. 🌺
I dont think you understand schizophrenia and the negative power of their hallucinations which leave them paranoid and isolated.
Really enjoyed this chat, too; I can't wait to get my book. !
Do it again and elaborate!
I think this book and subject deserves a lot more exposure.